CDI Quality Institute | Provider Led Entity

Nearby Locations

Provider Led Entity

In June of 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) named the CDI Quality Institute as one of the qualified Provider Led Entities (PLE) to assist in fulfilling the ambitious mandate in the 2014 federal Protecting Access to Medicare Act. The mandate will better assure that all Medicare patients receive the right imaging test at the right time.

The Institute’s governing board of physicians is devoted to developing appropriate use criteria (AUC) based on clinical evidence that is also of practical use for community-based physicians.

Below, please find answers to questions you may have about our Provider Led Entity.

Multidisciplinary Committee

The CDI Quality Institute serves as the provider-led entity (PLE) and the Institute’s PLE Multidisciplinary Committee serves as the multidisciplinary team. Certain functions and responsibilities are performed by contract with third parties.

2020 Multidisciplinary Committee Members:

  • Thomas J. Gilbert, MD, MPP – PLE, Chair
  • Robert Liddell, MD – Vice Chair
  • Lawrence Cowsill, DO
  • Robert Y. Kanterman, MD
  • Vincent Mathews, MD, FACR
  • Steven R. Pollei, MD
  • Elisabeth A. Quam
  • Michael Finch, PhD
  • Paul Allegra, MD

Under formal resolution by the CDI Quality Institute’s Council of Medical Directors, the PLE Multidisciplinary Committee is a free-standing committee within the Institute, created for the purpose of administering all of the functions of the multidisciplinary team as set forth in the federal regulations. This structure provides for the necessary transparency, autonomy and accountability in carrying out this responsibility. The PLE Multidisciplinary Committee has the following characteristics:

  • Members have been appointed by the Executive Committee from among the Members of the Council and employees of the Medical Practices that participate in the Institute, or from affiliated entities where there has been a demonstrated commitment to high quality, community-based health care services as well as for their independent professional judgment. These members serve indefinite terms, subject to removal for good cause and upon two-thirds vote of the Executive Committee.
  • Statistical Analysis support is provided by Michael Finch, PhD.
  • The PLE Multidisciplinary Committee’s determinations will not be subject to modification or rejection by The CDI Quality Institute, its Members, its Executive Committee or any other party.

AUC Library

The Multidisciplinary Committee is the initial and final authority on all Appropriate Use Criteria. For each clinical topic area, the Multidisciplinary Committee convenes subject expert panels, consisting of the individuals listed below, to provide an additional level of review and advice on current evidence- and consensus-based practices.

With the Institute’s commitment to prioritize areas of most use to community-based physicians while also adhering to the spirit and intent of the PAMA law and implementation regulations, the following Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) areas have been developed:

AUC Development & Evidentiary Review Process:

The CDI Quality Institute PLE’s evidentiary review process adheres to the following steps in developing appropriate use criteria (AUC).

The CDI Quality Institute PLE’s Multidisciplinary Committee (MDC) is ultimately responsible to assess the quality of evidence for the AUC topic areas. The MDC convenes expert panels to further inform its decision making. The MDC also has arranged for some literature assessments to be initially begun by AIM Specialty Health.

  1. For each subject area, our process includes an initial set of investigational questions, which we develop using the Patient/Problem, Interventions, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework. Those initial questions are reviewed, modified, and approved by the MDC.
  2. For certain topics, the MDC has arranged for AIM Specialty Health to undertake a literature search and grading process using the AGREE II instrument [a tool to assess the methodological rigor and transparency in which a guideline is developed] and the GRADE approach [a widely adopted, transparent framework for grading the quality of evidence]. For some topics, this literature search and grading process is completed by the CDI Quality Institute PLE.
    CDI QI PLE Strength of a Body of Evidence
  3. The results of the literature search and grading process are reviewed and our PLE statistician may modify the result. Our PLE Chair and support staff then develop a draft AUC narrative that synopsizes the relevant evidence and recommendations.
    CDI QI PLE Strength of Recommendation
  4. The expert panel then meets to review the draft AUC, and to discuss and modify as appropriate. The federal regulations require that “to the extent feasible” our AUC should be evidence-based; the regulations also require that we identify key points in each particular criterion as being evidence-based or consensus-based. We consider consensus statements developed by medical specialty societies and similar organizations.
  5. After the expert panel meets, the modified draft AUC is presented to the MDC for further review and discussion. Following approval by the MDC, the final AUC are published on the CDI Quality Institute PLE website, together with all authoring and supporting documentation.
  6. The AUC and supporting documentation for clinical priority areas, as defined by CMS, are reviewed and updated on an annual basis.

CDI Quality Institute and AIM Specialty Health Collaboration

The CDI Quality Institute and CDI have a decades-long history of pursuing public policy and medical practice solutions which add value to our patients and partners. The use of clinical decision support tools documents that the right test is done at the right time – and that is a good thing for ALL patients, not just those covered by the federal Medicare program. Therefore, the CDI Quality Institute continues to strive to build bridges which address the challenges of prior authorization for treating clinicians and their patients who are not covered by Medicare.

The CDI Quality Institute and AIM Specialty Health are building one of these bridges; it has a wide and high span.

  • The Institute is undertaking its AUC development work in collaboration with AIM Specialty Health (AIM).
  • AIM is a leading specialty benefits management company. For the past 30 years, AIM has developed appropriateness criteria for advanced radiology, which are integrated into a review system available online for providers to use through a secure online portal. AIM is accredited by both NCQA and URAC and meets the standards for clinical criteria development established by each of these organizations.
  • AIM has a proven internal process for the development of evidence-based criteria. A primary element of that established process, systematic literature review, is used to support the work of the Institute. For the purposes of this collaboration, AIM provides the Institute PLE Multidisciplinary Committee with the literature search results for evaluation in the sole discretion of the PLE Multidisciplinary Committee. The subsequent development and modification of AUC is undertaken exclusively by the Institute’s PLE Multidisciplinary Committee, and this committee does not endorse any guidelines created specifically by AIM. The autonomous responsibility for developing AUC is firmly vested in the PLE Multidisciplinary Committee.

Conflicts of Interest

The CDI Quality Institute and our PLE have a robust policy to address the issue of actual or perceived conflicts of interest.  The policy was reviewed and approved by the Federal government as part of our qualification process.  Any director, principal officer or member of the PLE Committee, or any person who participates in the Committee’s efforts to develop or modify AUC is subject to this policy.  Persons subject to the policy must disclose (and update) any ownership, investment, compensation or other financial interest with a broad range of stakeholders and are subject to exclusion from participation in the AUC development process based on certain criteria.  The policy is implemented and overseen by the PLE Administrator.

  • To read our Conflicts of Interest Policy, click here
  • To view our Conflicts of Interest reporting form, click here

Contact Us

Erik Rockswold, PLE Administrator
erik.rockswold@cdirad.com
952-543-6519

Christopher “Kit” Crancer, Institute Director
Christopher.Crancer@cdirad.com